A BOUDICA POINT OF VIEW: Take No Prisoners
By Alexis Ainsworth
“OPEN LETTER TO FOX / NEWSCORP: No More ‘Fair and Balanced’?
ROGER AND RUPERT HAVE GONE POTTY AND DOTTY OVER OBAMA”
A ‘FAIR AND BALANCED’ TRILOGY
The following Email transmissions are POSTED AT ‘BOUDICA WEBLOG’ / A BOUDICA POINT OF VIEW: Take No Prisoners”
1-27-11 POST SCRIPT TO TRANSMISSION BELOW TO VARNEY/ CAVUTO 1-26-11 RE ‘OPEN LETTER TO FOX’
Correction to message:
Beyond you, Mr. Varney, as a harbinger of a ‘Fair and Balanced’ standard against the backdrop of Fox/Newscorp’s agenda to placate Obama, also among those in his Crosshairs there is the irrepressible Judge N. who holds the standard of total integrity of “Fair and Balanced”. This is because his exclusive gameboard is The Constitution. He ‘takes no prisoners’ and makes no ‘policy concessions’ to the political agenda that is diminishing the glow on Fox’ logo.
The agenda is subtle but very obvious to any functional cerebrospinal system: Everyone in the Fox line-up, including Cavuto (possibly Asmuth, another exception) is playing a hedge game to placate the radical Left agenda against Fox, obviously led by Obama. It is repugnantly clear as Obama’s main targets at FN – Beck and Hannity – have lately been curbing their commentary by two obvious methods:
!.) Increasing omission of factual explanatory evidence that supports the dissent they claim in their rhetoric of discontent concerning the Obama-regime’s radical ‘destroy America’s traditional social and economic culture’.
2,) The Grid: Programming manipulation. Toned-down, carefully orchestrated, guest line-up relative to timing of sensitive subjects that are news events directly relating to Obama and the far Left agenda.
One example: Yesterday’s ‘Friends’ line-up. Not one genuinely conservative voice in the guest line-up, but an overload of Grovelers. Gingrich is ‘fair and balanced’ by default on the side of Gingrich; he attacks conservatives outside of the Beltway culture, and Obama as well - failing to anchor a standard other than his own ego. Brinkley, as with Dorris Kearns Goodwin have about as much integrity as presidential historians as do Skinner’s Pigeons. McCain, along with his pals Graham, Hatch, et al – couldn’t be truthful even if he were threatened with be returned to a POW camp.
A 3rd manipulation: “Mr. Obama, I really like you, but…” A dumb, hollowed-out gord has a better resonance than is the resounding echo of total ignorance that supports the lie of this being a profitable loss-leader to polish Obama’s ego so to short-circuit his dictatorial wrath against any and all – right down to Joe the Plumber – when being exposed for what he is: A dictatorial sociopath, a total fraud, who has so far met every single standard of treason against this country from foreign to domestic policies across the board.
Forget the drones, his strategy is to ‘give the appearance of fighting terrorism while exposing the U.S. to mass terrorism through the back door (what are a few lives to Obama, Soros, and their incumbent constituency? Nothing.): 1,2,3:
1.) Middle-East/Iran policies; 2.) China policy 3.) DOJ policies. undermining the U.S.
1.) Every appointment, every Cabinet member, every Czar - without a single exception has a record of aggression against the laws and values of this country - at one or another level - including those who were spotted and given positions because they would tow Obama’s line, though their propensity to do so was not as blatant as it is now – that includes Napolitano and Sibellius.
2.) Wall St / Goldman / AIG / The Fed / GE / EU / Fannie-Freddie / on and on – every single instance a slide of hand of theirs and Obama’s Self-Protectionism at the expense of the country’s economic and cultural welfare – to its ultimate destruction in the not distant future
3.) Anti-State policies / Border migration / ObamaCare – at the expense of the country’s welfare.
How is it logically possible for an individual who has forced such radical ‘transformation’ on America to be ‘likable’?!
Any American with any degree of literacy and moral footing – based on the founding philosophy of this country – who claims to “like Obama…but….” has no standards or loyalty to any standard, and is pathetic: Either a Liar or a Fool.
In the former: A co-conspirator. In the latter: Pathetically disturbed psycho-dynamically. Liking Obama while he fundamentally destroys this country is no different than ‘slightly pregnant’.
When Imus slobbers, “I really do like him…but…” - the dissonance of an empty suit trying to placate Sharpton is shattering.
The point: While it is subtle, crowding the guest roster with a carefully orchestrated line-up of RINO’s and Left-leaning guests – without a credible vocal balance – immediately following the STOU address – on the out-of-the-box morning show, as well as those shows that are particularly targeted by Obama is a major concession to Obama, at the expense of disseminating a news template of comprehensive facts within a context of the origin of the agenda lying behind them and their critical effect on our world.
Meanwhile, the country continues in its deep sleep about all of it, along with Fox. Treason is both by omission and commission – however benignly it is packaged..
MEMO TO VARNEY / CAVUTO TRANSMITTED 1-26-11
Mr. Varney, the post below has gone today to the Boudica WordPress website in the column “A Boudica Point of View: Take No Prisoners”. Its distribution ought also to have included you in its email transmission list – as being the ‘only’ exception to an increasing dissatisfaction with Fox’ claim of ‘Fair and Balanced’ programming. The article is self-explanatory on this point.
As Ms. Perino is singled out among others on Fox, it should have been said also, that you are poorly matched with Ms. Dana in your various appearances together. It demeans the integrity of what so far appears to be a host who is wowed by standards, not bought by agendas – as is she. She hasn’t the courtesy to allow you or anyone else to complete a thought, often not even a sentence – forever interrupting. At any rate, your ‘company’ are terrific along with you – now, if you can just keep Cavuto from caving into the behind-the-scenes agenda (as described below) — and, if you really want to do the public a favor, get rid of Imus – his pathetic total lack of a proper education, not to mention his mono-syllabic endless extensions of childish jibber by use of 5-year old expletives with a social-education that peaked at “sticks and stones” – he is too embarrassing to an educated psyche – still hanging on to old RINO’s to persuade himself that he is relevant, such as McCain, Hatch, Kerry (both) on and on – all of whom should have retired by now along with him - and he, at least, should be replaced by an expanded Varney & Co. in that time slot!
See “OPEN LETTER TO FOX / NEWSCORP: No More Fair and Balanced:? ROGER AND RUPERT HAVE GONE DOTTY AND POTTY OVER OBAMA” transmitted by email 1-36-11 as indicated.
A BOUDICA POINT OF VIEW: Take No Prisoners
By Alexis Ainsworth
Wed. a.m. 1-26-11
OPEN LETTER TO FOX / NEWSCORP: No More ‘Fair and Balanced’?
ROGER AND RUPERT HAVE GONE POTTY AND DOTTY OVER OBAMA
Posted 1-36-11 at Boudica WordPress / A Boudica Point o ViewTransmitted by email 1-26-11 to: Ailes, Murdoch, Baier, ‘Friends’, Beck, O’Reilly, Varney, Cavuto;
NOTE: CORRECTION TO ORIGINAL BELOW, NAME MEANT WAS: FRANK MARSHALL DAVIS:
Fox is doing a yeoman’s job of laying the groundwork for a new network to fill its emptying “Fair and Balanced Britches” Fair and balanced logic underwrites the fact that only a network claiming it doesn’t take sides has the dubious right of self-destructing when at its peak of success – as it plays straight into the hand of its antagonists whom it claims to be independent of. At the same time it egotistically really believes that its viewers aren’t noticing as it expresses its Inner-MSM cowardice by use of surrogate stealth ploys to pander to the White House in what is becoming a blatant display of sycophantism. Obviously it is designed to ease the multilayered below-the-surface politically-threatening pressure on Newscorps/FN from the Obama thuggery.
No one who is objective has ever thought that O’Reilly has a grain of intellectual or social integrity (Limbaugh has his Ted Baxter persona down pat), but it is a safe bet that even the critical mass of naive unthinking American-protoplasm that follow him will at some point emerge from its stupor to notice that O’Reilly has always been a sell-out of Fair and Balanced by definition of his ‘Me-Tarzan’ maneuvering of topics and guests aired on his program. His strategy is to interrupt and shoot down every objective critical observation made by guests having an educated perspective that upstages his agenda to block any deserved criticism of the Obama crowd’s agendas – hoping for an interview which he just got. A total fraud..
It’s a tight-rope that he and Beck walk while posing as true crusaders of ‘Fair and Balanced’, each differently, of course. Someone has put a silencer on Beck’s mouth that leaves a Great Vacuum when he slides past salutary data that would substantiate his points when doing so requires a direct hit on Obama that would exceed the negotiated boundaries forced on Murdoch and Ailes by the Obama crowd, but would nail Beck’s credibility. Beck leaves out the structural indices that provide unqualified exposure of known, documented, facts concerning Obama’s radical, racist-driven, Communistic-ideological agenda to a political game-board; not a legal one – that NewsCorp uses as cover for its sycophant cowardice to hedge their economic interests, not recognizing that in the longer run they are undermining the very structure of their ‘initial’ success.
Beck’s claim disqualifier: “Don’t take my word for it” – while omitting all framework that directly ties his claims into a coherent logic – to Obama. This is a poorly executed political strategy – not a legal one; the difference between the two lies in the stratagems that define Fair and Balanced from Cowardice in Media. It would be a ratings blowout if at any time while pointing to the propensity of various Czars to promote a gay agenda, and while addressing the underlying ideology of Obama’s rationalizations and policy choices, were he also to inform his audience of the fact that Obama admits having, as a ‘young boy’ been mentored, groomed, schooled and influenced by, and in the scandalous home environment of, a man who openly, in writing, promoted and admitted his pedophilia ‘with young boys’ – none other, of course, than the disreputable Communist sexual-predator, Frank Marshall Davis. Instead, the structural elements of Obama’s reasoning are omitted, not for legal reasons, but for self-serving political reasons – at the obvious expense of the public who follow him and O’Reilly as lambs to the slaughter.
Beck appears to have forgotten Obama’s name entirely – except when repeatedly apologizing for having once been truthful when defining Obama as a “racist’ – a claim for which there is a lifetime of proven fact. What is obvious is the inside baseball backroom strategy that is being manipulated to placate Obama-etal with slobbering disclaimers of what is so obvious, coming from senior management, top on down. In recent weeks and months, there has been a distinct deviation curve in play moving away from Fox’ earlier ‘fair and balanced’ – former full-er disclosure of newsworthy facts that provide its audience with data to decide for itself. .
If Morris gets slightly out of line with analysis, he is bull-dozed by O’Reilly. Rove, Krauthammer, are far too self-imbued with unutterably over-rated self-importance that wreaks of the beltway RINO partyline, to ever actually step out of O’Reilly’s dragnet on camera. Krauthammer is single-handedly destroying Baier’s news hour now that he’s found a platform to achieve the sycophantism that he requires from his peers, to have softened the scowl-lines that have always distinguished his ferocious self-important attitude demanding that he be recognized as the grand-arbiter of all things intellectually dependent on psychological scrutiny. He is pathetic as he is so obviously psychologically impaired. It took a great deal of fawning over him to release his smile lines from the rigidity of his body’s paralysis. The paralysis of his psyche is a paradigm of that of his body – by an inverse sequence of psycho-physical impairment. And, he – the last word on everyone’s psycho-dynamic welfare, doesn’t even know his own pathology.
Then, there is little Dana Perino toting the same inside DC RINO self-importance at the expense of Fair and Balanced. Bottom line: Fox’ pandering of Obama has an increasingly fowl stench that was accelerated this a.m. as it paraded out a line up of RINO, and/or left-leaning experts to comment on Obama’s SOTU last night - no doubt to preserve its increasingly ingratiated approval ratings from Obama, etal For God’s sake, Brinkley?! Gingrich?! McCain?! If there was any redeeming programming after Gingrich, by then most morning viewers would not have known, they had tuned out and off the channel.
O’Reilly’s audience hasn’t noticed that his guest line-up is pathetically devoid of guests that simply will not reduce their own stature by reflection of the poorness of his by appearing on his program – but, Obama would, of course, he couldn’t sink any lower in stature than he is already. He simply wants to prove that he can make O’Reilly look worse – by comparison to himself. Bravo! What is Fox going to do when Obama’s means of achieving his goals have justified your end?
Roger is getting too old to build a new mouse-trap for its viewers who aren’t interested to invest themselves in an effective Obama-NewsCorp joint-venture at the expense of America’s need for honest media. Maybe he and Murdoch are becoming a bit dotty? After all it’s been a long time since Roger was ‘small and thin’ – when we knew one another very well from 1968 on for a few years (I, by a different name at the time). The years since have added to Roger’s weight-clout - bi-laterally. Too late for another challenge – and it would appear – also too soft to win the one he presently needs to face to protect Fox from self-destruction.
2-07-11 Update: I was wrong It was a draw …
I was wrong; It was a draw. There is no way to make Obama look better than anyone, and no way for O’Reilly to make anyone look worse than O’Reilly..
A Boudica Point of View: Take No Prisoners