Reblogged from Cmblake6's Weblog:
May be exactly what he was thinking, as I've been saying, or maybe we've been fooled.
Every liberal citation to Wickard will be countered by a conservative citing to Chief Justice Roberts's opinion: "If no enumerated power authorizes Congress to pass a certain law, that law may not be enacted, even if it would not violate any of the express prohibitions in the Bill of Rights or elsewhere in the Constitution.
Donate To Help Us Stay Online
Boudica BPI
Boudica.US
boudicabpi.boudica.us
BPI for Palen
Queen Boudica blog
Act for America
AMERICAN BLOGGER: GUNNY.G
Blonde Sagicity
Boudicabpi Polls
Burn a Qur'an
Cmblake6's Weblog
Crockett Lives
cryandhowl
Debbie Schlussel.com
Defend michael Behenna
Femininican
Grumpy Opinions
Holger Awakens
http://lorinovsreport.wordpress.com/
ironic Surrealism
Jericho 777's blog
Muslims Against Sharia Blog
Nebraska Energy Observer
New Zeal
Oathkeepers
Phoebe's Detention Room
Puma By Design
Sarah Pac
Sarah Palin for president 2012
Sarah Palin Radio
Swiss Defence League
TeamSarah
The Dirty Lowdown
The Lorinov Report
The Mad jewess
the religion of peace
theodores world
USA Defence League
Voting American
warsclerotic
Queen Boudica
Ann Coulter
Michelle Malkin
If you don't like my opinions
feedjit
NYS 20th militia
The myths of Muhammad
Reblogged this on Phoebe's Detention Room and commented:
It’s not a “Roberts Tactic”, tactic would be a strategy or ploy to achieve an end result that is contrary to the implied end result. I’ve said this often in the last few days, had Roberts used his vote as a strategy for people to vote for Romney it would be a long shot gamble on his part and I don’t think Roberts is a gambling man. The other aspect is, why not just vote against it and that would have the same result as repealing it, only easier, except it wouldn’t have the same odds that Obama would be voted out.