A lot of unanswered questions about this Obama character!
THE DAILY PEN NEW YORK, NY – While preparing the second part of our investigative report on the statistical examination of the contents of the image of Obama’s alleged 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth”, there are a few things we need to be reminded of about this contemptible, overemphasized record.
View original post 1,530 more words
Unanswered questioned indeed. Seems to me the questions were never asked. The democrats were so hot in get their man that they were willing to overlook whatever flaws he had. And the big headed, arrogant, marginally intelligent BHO/Lucifer fit their “clean articulate black man” mold that they decided that sacrificing our Constitution was a small price to pay to have their half white puppet, parading around in his black skin, sitting in the seat of power. The perfect Trojan horse to bring America to her knees.
Kenyan-born Obama Heads to U.S. Senate:
The MEDIA “DECIDED FOR US”
He had Illegal Foreign contributions:
This also includes “Wire Fraud”:
Title 18 U.S.C. § 1343 provides, in part:
Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, transmits or causes to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, or television communication in interstate or foreign commerce, any writings, signs, signals, pictures, or sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
Write-in Presidential candidate Montgomery Blair Sibley asserts that by knowingly submitting a forged certificate of live birth and ‘long form birth certificate’ on line to the American public,
the “scheme” that President Obama appears to have intended is to obtain a job that he is not eligible to hold given his lack of “natural born Citizen” status. See, e.g., United States v. Granberry, 908 F.2d 278, 279 (8th Cir. 1990)
Initially, it is well-settled that the “use of the Internet for transmission of images or messages satisfies the requirement of interstate commerce.” See, e.g., United States v. Carroll, 105 F.3d 740, 742 (1st Cir. 1997). Moreover, to seek to obtain public money – here the salary of the President of the United States – has been recognized as satisfying the “money” element of §1343. See, e.g., Pasquantino v. United States, 544 U.S. 349, 356-57 (2005) (recognizing that money in the public treasury is the government’s “money” for purposes of the mail fraud statute.)