“From the beginning of the administration, the White House has asked news outlets not to report on or photograph the Obama children when they are not with their parents and there is no vital news interest. We have reminded outlets of this request in order to protect the privacy and security of these girls.”
There is an interest when it’s costing the American people a big hunk of change for these trips. Screw you Obama!
Bob A.
By Chris Ariens on March 20, 2012 3:33 PM
Drudge Report is making a big deal today about how the White House had asked U.S. media organizations to not cover Malia Obama‘s Spring Break trip to Oaxaca, Mexico. A search through TVEyes shows no U.S. TV network has covered the pre-teen’s trip. Politico reports several websites have scrubbed stories about the trip from their websites after being asked to do so. A White House spokesperson says:
From the beginning of the administration, the White House has asked news outlets not to report on or photograph the Obama children when they are not with their parents and there is no vital news interest. We have reminded outlets of this request in order to protect the privacy and security of these girls.
But things changed this afternoon when a 7.6 earthquake struck near Acapulco in the state of Guerrero, which shares…
View original post 14 more words
Did Chelsea Clinton recieve such care and concern? No she did not. Did the Bush twins recieve such care and concern? No they did not. The parents of the aformentioned children DID not use their kids as campaign props…but that is all the Obama’s do. Give me break. They use them at the drop of a hat and then cry foul when someone points out the hypocracy (sp) of their behavior.