A woman’s revenge


If you comment we reserve the right to use your comment in/as a post

Follow us, donate and help us stay on-line.

Follow Boudicabpi on Twitter

This entry was posted in humor, Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

58 Responses to A woman’s revenge

  1. upaces88 says:

    The last husband I had was when I was in the nightclub business….he LOVED the $ I made; and decided he didn’t need to work much. He worked at General Motors, and I don’t think that company EVER fired anyone ever!
    This is just one of the stories.
    I had a woman come into one of my clubs with no experience but had 3 kids to support. I turned her into a great waitress.
    One morning a knock came at my door. It was Donna. She looked so serious. She said she and my husband had fallen in love and she wanted him to move in with her.
    I fell to the lowest step and began crying.
    Donna apologized.
    My exact words were: “No, you don’t understand. You have no idea what you are getting into.
    “You can have him on one condition. DO NOT ever bring him back. I’ll see you at work Friday night and he is NOT allowed in the club”
    She was so pleased.
    About a week later, my doorbell rang. You guessed it. Donna was at the door.
    She started to say something and I interrupted. “No, Donna, he cannot come back.”
    Then she started crying and wanting to know how to get rid of him.
    Told her who to go to for a job and I’d give her a good reference and to move close to the club (way way across town so he couldn’t have her followed.)

  2. Ken says:

    YO LAILA!!! So your saying thats why Hillary put up with Bills carrousing? She was getting muslim women pussy? She Lesbian? You sound VERY ANTI about morality! How do you know this about Hillary? Did she have a few licks of yours?

    • Ken….

      Haven’t you heard about Huma Abedin? wife of the Weiner who had to post his dick on-line to other women? She’s Hillary’s secretary or sumtin….Huma’s family is also MB family.
      Let’s be honest…if you were a woman married to Billy boy…wouldn’t you be turning to the same sex?….You wouldn’t know whose mouth his member had been in last….

      • Laila Rasheed says:

        YO Warrior,

        Isn’t it amazing that people like Ken, who have Google at their fingertips, don’t have sufficient grey matter to research Hillary & Huma Abedin?

        Ken & Homer Simpson were in the same class at school and Homer was their best student!

        • Ken says:

          LO BITCH! Some of us are AMERICANS! And WORK for a living! We cant GOOGLE every piece of SHIT we hear! We rely on reliable NEWS PEOPLE to inform us. Not like fucked up muslims like YOU who suck off welfare! And have time to google every dam thing! Talk about GRAY matter. YOURS must be between your legs! Ive more grey matter than you have total brains! Muslim BITCH! GO THE FUCK HOME!

        • Ken says:

          sure INTERESTS YOU for some reason!

          • upaces88 says:

            You look for the truth from the “news people”? Ken, Ken, Ken, they are NOT allowed to tell everything they know.
            Do you remember the BP Oil Spill? I went to school with one of the Fox News People. At that same time, there was also another oil spill that was not reported. Obama had our own Military sabotage it.
            Yet, NOT ONE THING was on the News media on TV.
            I have friends who also work ALL the time…then they have to pick up their children from after-school-care…then home to fix dinner. By the time they get to watch TV, they only get, maybe, bits and pieces of the truth.
            Why do you think Obama wants so badly to grab the Internet.

            I do understand. It was only a couple of months ago, that a long time friend emailed me. I knew this woman when she was 14 yrs old and at my house everyday. She works “3” jobs and doesn’t have time to be online.

            She was scared! She had just found out about Obama and his Muslim background as well as the news about this BC.

            Please stop “attacking people.” Everyone wants to hear what you have to say… but as soon as you attack someone, any valid point you may have will be ignored due to your negative and argumentative style of blogging. Stop calling people names. I know that isn’t the way to behave around work, so why must you do it here?

            • Ken says:

              I know they arent all allowed to say everything in the news. Its NOT news i get majority of my info from! I listen to Rush Limbaugh. Sean Hanity. Michael Savage. Bill Cunningham. and more! Plus I read things posted on places like this! As for name calling? It WASNT me who started that here! Attacking people? WHO ATTACKED ME FIRST? I was defending! After being attacked! All started just because i said Hillary should have done that to Bill! Innocent comment made just in fun in regard to the TOPIC! I know who the ultimate enemy is! And its NOT Islam! Its SATAN! I dont have to know ISLAM to know its not right! And I know enuff about it to know its NOT Christain! I was criticized because I didnt know about Hillary? Is that the most important issue were facing? I was called stupid for not googling it and learning about it? That I dont know HOW to google! Why those attacks against me? The hell with all of this. Comments and disagreeing on opinions is fine! Thats what this is all about. BUT if I get attacked personally, and name called for MY opinion, I will defend! If anyone can accept an apology then ill say im sorry. And yes I DID pray for Laila and redneckwarrior. And on that topic i was attacked personally again remember? Even by YOU upaces! Anyone who cant accept an apology now can just leave me alone in the future and never bother saying anything to or about me ever again when I make any comment on any blog. Just go your way and leave me alone. Ill do the same!

        • upaces88 says:

          You don’t get out much, do you?!
          This has been common knowledge for a long time. Might try GOOGLE sometime!

      • Ken says:

        NO ive never heard about HUMA! But then HILLARY has never been a focus of MY interest! BILL was president! NOT hillary! And NO I wouldnt turn to the same sex no matter WHAT! Thats why i said she should have done like what this post was all about in first place! MAKE HIM CUT IT OFF! But our WISE MUSLIM LAILA must have gotten LAILAD by bill a few times! or she has dentures and can remove her teeth and please him good!

        • Ken….

          So…you’re one of those low information voters then.

          Hillary was the Secretary of State for four years….she also ran for President. One would then think that there should have been some interest as to what Hillary was doing….Hmmmm? Relying on Reliable News people….when you find any let me know!!

          BTW……just because someone uses a muslim sounding name, doesn’t mean they are muslim! It just means they decided to use that for a name on blogs…nothing more. I have seen many English sounding names that hide the fact that the person who is commenting is most likely muslim or a dhimmi. Read what they are saying…..if they stick up for Islam…then most likely they fall within the two categories I have mentioned.

          I don’t think Laila is muslim….She wouldn’t have written what she wrote about Muslim Pussy! Nor the other content for that matter.

          In my Opinion…..Calling some one a bitch is very low class and immature. I don’t know what your problem is with Laila but common sense says that if you don’t like her comments…..don’t fuckin’ read them!!!!

          • Ken says:

            Im not a low information voter! I know what Hillary was and did and attempted and IS! And BITCH isnt as bad as some other names! Low class? Immature? Saying the truth is low class? Laila certainly ISNT a conservative or republican! You can spot LEFTISTS easily! My comment was first attacked by LAILA! Muslim or not, she is obviously liberal/democrat! But I still think she is Muslim! Laila first attacked ME and my comment personally! I DEFENDED MYSELF! And if YOU dont like it, dont fuckin read them or interfere! Mind your own business!!!!

            • Ken says:

              Hillary ran for president BEFORE she became SEC of STATE! You have them turned around!!!! Had she become Pres, and while she was campaigning, I was interested in things about her regarding her past should she become president! When she LOST nomination I was no longer concerned about her past regarding becoming President! But as Sec of State i was concerned about her PERFORMANCE during those years! Not whos pussy or dick she had! And still AM concerned about what she did during that time specifically regarding Benghazi! And IF theres anything that can convict her it will be THAT! Not a muslim womans pussy! Lets focus on important stuff!

              • upaces88 says:

                Actually, Ken, she DID win to run for President, and was kicked to the curb by the Obama Team.
                Following that, McCain/Palin actually won and wee also kicked to the curb.

            • upaces88 says:

              Ken, you loose credibility if you have to stoop to calling names. No one trusts you after that.

          • Laila Rasheed says:

            I wish to fcuk, someone would get rid of you, Ken!

            You are an old sissy!


            WANK’UM-FCUK’UM & STONE’UM

            And surely thou hast sublime morals
            (Surat Al-Qalam 68:4).
            Ye have indeed in the Messenger of Allah an excellent exemplar
            (Surat Al-Ahzab 33:21).
            Muslims believe that the Koran is the eternal word/laws of god to acts as a divine guidance for mankind about how to live a moral, righteous life. Prophet Muhammad, the highest perfection of human life and the prototype of the most wonderful human conduct in Islamic belief, emulated the guidance of Allah perfectly.


            HOW TO THIGH
            Now let us see how it is practiced on a female child & who began this evil practice. According to an official Fatwa issued in Saudi Arabia, the prophet Muhammad began to practice thighing his child-bride, Aisha when she was 6 years old until she reached 9 years of age (Fatwa No. 31409). The hadith, which was quoted earlier, mentioned the prophet Muhammad started performing literal sex with Aisha ONLY when she reached the age of 9 (Sahih al-Bukhari, book 62, hadith No. 89).

            Muslim scholars collectively agree, a child becomes an adult, available for sexual intercourse as soon as she reaches the age of nine. Likewise, the Shari’a allows any of the faithful to marry a six-year-old child.
            According to the fatwa, the prophet Muhammad could not have sex with his fiancée, Aisha when she was six due to her small size & age. However, the fatwa said that at age six, he would put his penis between her thighs and massage it gently because he did not want to harm her.

            Imagine a man of 51 removing the clothes of a 6-year-old girl and slipping his erect penis between her thighs, rubbing her until he ejaculated and his semen ran down her thighs. To this day, this is considered a benevolent act on the part of the adult male “not wanting to harm her.” What harm could be inflicted upon a young girl mentally and emotionally if not a grown man showing her his penis and stripping her of her clothes and rubbing his male organ between her legs?

            Of course the twisted mind that does such an evil to a female child, would not hesitate to ejaculate on her body. And if this sexually perverted evil frame of mind committed such an act upon a child, the pedophile would not stop at ejaculating on her. His evil desire would go further and rape the child before she was a mature adult. This is exactly what Muhammad did to Aisha when she was yet a child of 9.

            Before she reached puberty, he began to have sex with her. Let us see what the fatwa said about the prophet of Islam and his child-bride, Aisha.“Praise be to Allah and peace be upon the one after whom there is no [further] prophet. After the permanent committee for the scientific research and fatwas (religious decrees) reviewed the question presented to the grand Mufti Abu Abdullah Muhammad Al-Shamari, with reference number 1809 issued on 3/8/1421(Islamic calendar).

            The inquirer asked the following:‘It has become wide spread these days, and especially during weddings, the habit of mufakhathat of the children (mufakhathat literally translated means “placing between the thighs of children” which means placing the male erected penis between the thighs of a child). What is the opinion of scholars knowing full well that the prophet, the peace and prayers of Allah be upon him, also practiced the “thighing” of Aisha – the mother of believers ?’
            After the committee studied the issue, they gave the following reply: ‘It has not been the practice of the Muslims throughout the centuries to resort to this unlawful practice that has come to our countries from pornographic movies that the kofar (infidels) and enemies of Islam send. As for the Prophet, peace and prayers of Allah be upon him, thighing his fiancée Aisha. She was six years of age and he could not have intercourse with her due to her small age.

            That is why the prophet peace and prayers of Allah be upon him placed his penis between her thighs and massaged it lightly, as the apostle of Allah had control of his penis not like other believers’” (Fatwa No. 31409).

            Thighing of children is practiced in many Arab and Muslim countries, notably in Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Iran, and the Gulf countries. Also evil practices like altamatu’a bil almuka’aba (pleasure from sexual contact with her breasts), altamatu’a bil alsagirah (pleasure from sexual contact with a baby girl), altamatu’a bil alradi’ah, (pleasure from sexual contact with a suckling female infant), (Reported by Baharini Women’s Rights Activist, Ghada Jamshir)

            Mohammed heard one of his wives was leaving him, so he rushed home where he found her on the carpet in front of the tent with her belongings; he sat down beside her & said, “I heard you were planning to leave me?”
            She replied, “Yes, I heard your other wives saying, you were a pedophile!”
            Mohammed thinks for a minute or so & then responds,
            “that’s a mighty big word for a 6 year old child.”

            • Ken says:

              WELL youve PROBABLY FUCKED them all already! LAID LAYLA! Sissy? Damn your so senseless! TELL ME YOU sick bitch! WTF does all this muslim sex BULLSHIT have to do with American Politics? ITS IRRELEVANT! I dont care about what they do! OR how much pussy Hillary gets! IM INTERESTED in Americas future! MY COUNTRY! And actions of MUSLIMS and TERRORISTS that affect the FUTURE of AMERICA! Im interested in POLICIES that UNDERMINE the constitution! That TAKES AWAY freedom from ME and future generations! Its about POLITICS! YOU have a sick OBSESSED MIND! We ALL know MUSLIMS are sexually SICKENING! Thatw why whats important is GETTING THEM ALL THE FUCK OUT OF USA! And STOPPING MUSLIM influence in politics! And stopping MUSLIM OBAMA! Thats what im interested in!
              I made a SIMPLE comment on this blog that I thought was mostly for FUN! NEVER expected shit like THIS to happen as a result! It WASNT my intention to have this arguement! YOU INCLUDED DYNAMIC red necked warrior woman! The HELL with this shit! Want to argue? Ill keep going long as you will. But I hope our readers understand what im saying. MUSLIM SEX AND HILLARYS CRAVING for PUSSY will NOT move the important things to light that benefit AMERICA!

              • Ken says:

                this is a POINTLESS arguement!

              • Laila Rasheed says:


                KEN’S COUNTRY!

                The Real Thanksgiving
                Quoted from: The Hidden History of Massachusetts
                Much of America’s understanding of the early relationship between the Indian and the European is conveyed through the story of Thanksgiving. Proclaimed a holiday in 1863 by Abraham Lincoln, this fairy tale of a feast was allowed to exist in the American imagination pretty much untouched until 1970, the 350th anniversary of the landing of the Pilgrims. That is when Frank B. James, president of the Federated Eastern Indian League, prepared a speech for a Plymouth banquet that exposed the Pilgrims for having committed, among other crimes, the robbery of the graves of the Wampanoags. He wrote:
                “We welcomed you, the white man, with open arms, little knowing that it was the beginning of the end; that before 50 years were to pass, the Wampanoag would no longer be a free people.”
                But white Massachusetts officials told him he could not deliver such a speech and offered to write him another. Instead, James declined to speak, and on Thanksgiving Day hundreds of Indians from around the country came to protest. It was the first National Day of Mourning, a day to mark the losses Native Americans suffered as the early settlers prospered. This true story of “Thanksgiving” is what whites did not want Mr. James to tell.
                What Really Happened in Plymouth in 1621?
                According to a single-paragraph account in the writings of one Pilgrim, a harvest feast did take place in Plymouth in 1621, probably in mid-October, but the Indians who attended were not even invited. Though it later became known as “Thanksgiving,” the Pilgrims never called it that. And amidst the imagery of a picnic of interracial harmony is some of the most terrifying bloodshed in New World history.
                The Pilgrim crop had failed miserably that year, but the agricultural expertise of the Indians had produced twenty acres of corn, without which the Pilgrims would have surely perished. The Indians often brought food to the Pilgrims, who came from England ridiculously unprepared to survive and hence relied almost exclusively on handouts from the overly generous Indians-thus making the Pilgrims the western hemisphere’s first class of welfare recipients. The Pilgrims invited the Indian sachem Massasoit to their feast, and it was Massasoit, engaging in the tribal tradition of equal sharing, who then invited ninety or more of his Indian brothers and sisters-to the annoyance of the 50 or so ungrateful Europeans. No turkey, cranberry sauce or pumpkin pie was served; they likely ate duck or geese and the venison from the 5 deer brought by Massasoit. In fact, most, if not all, of the food was most likely brought and prepared by the Indians, whose 10,000-year familiarity with the cuisine of the region had kept the whites alive up to that point.
                The Pilgrims wore no black hats or buckled shoes-these were the silly inventions of artists hundreds of years since that time. These lower-class Englishmen wore brightly colored clothing, with one of their church leaders recording among his possessions “1 paire of greene drawers.” Contrary to the fabricated lore of storytellers generations since, no Pilgrims prayed at the meal, and the supposed good cheer and fellowship must have dissipated quickly once the Pilgrims brandished their weaponry in a primitive display of intimidation. What’s more, the Pilgrims consumed a good deal of home brew. In fact, each Pilgrim drank at least a half gallon of beer a day, which they preferred even to water. This daily inebriation led their governor, William Bradford, to comment on his people’s “notorious sin,” which included their “drunkenness and uncleanliness” and rampant “sodomy”…
                The Pilgrims of Plymouth, The Original Scalpers
                Contrary to popular mythology the Pilgrims were no friends to the local Indians. They were engaged in a ruthless war of extermination against their hosts, even as they falsely posed as friends. Just days before the alleged Thanksgiving love-fest, a company of Pilgrims led by Myles Standish actively sought to chop off the head of a local chief. They deliberately caused a rivalry between two friendly Indians, pitting one against the other in an attempt to obtain “better intelligence and make them both more diligent.” An 11-foot-high wall was erected around the entire settlement for the purpose of keeping the Indians out.
                Any Indian who came within the vicinity of the Pilgrim settlement was subject to robbery, enslavement, or even murder. The Pilgrims further advertised their evil intentions and white racial hostility, when they mounted five cannons on a hill around their settlement, constructed a platform for artillery, and then organized their soldiers into four companies-all in preparation for the military destruction of their friends the Indians.
                Pilgrim Myles Standish eventually got his bloody prize. He went to the Indians, pretended to be a trader, then beheaded an Indian man named Wituwamat. He brought the head to Plymouth, where it was displayed on a wooden spike for many years, according to Gary B. Nash, “as a symbol of white power.” Standish had the Indian man’s young brother hanged from the rafters for good measure. From that time on, the whites were known to the Indians of Massachusetts by the name “Wotowquenange,” which in their tongue meant cutthroats and stabbers.
                Who Were the “Savages”?
                The myth of the fierce, ruthless Indian savage lusting after the blood of innocent Europeans must be vigorously dispelled at this point. In actuality, the historical record shows that the very opposite was true.
                Once the European settlements stabilized, the whites turned on their hosts in a brutal way. The once amicable relationship was breeched again and again by the whites, who lusted over the riches of Indian land. A combination of the Pilgrims’ demonization of the Indians, the concocted mythology of Eurocentric historians, and standard Hollywood propaganda has served to paint the gentle Indian as a tomahawk-swinging savage endlessly on the warpath, lusting for the blood of the God-fearing whites.
                But the Pilgrims’ own testimony obliterates that fallacy. The Indians engaged each other in military contests from time to time, but the causes of “war,” the methods, and the resulting damage differed profoundly from the European variety:
                o Indian “wars” were largely symbolic and were about honor, not about territory or extermination.
                o “Wars” were fought as domestic correction for a specific act and were ended when correction was achieved. Such action might better be described as internal policing. The conquest or destruction of whole territories was a European concept.
                o Indian “wars” were often engaged in by family groups, not by whole tribal groups, and would involve only the family members.
                o A lengthy negotiation was engaged in between the aggrieved parties before escalation to physical confrontation would be sanctioned. Surprise attacks were unknown to the Indians.
                o It was regarded as evidence of bravery for a man to go into “battle” carrying no weapon that would do any harm at a distance-not even bows and arrows. The bravest act in war in some Indian cultures was to touch their adversary and escape before he could do physical harm.
                o The targeting of non-combatants like women, children, and the elderly was never contemplated. Indians expressed shock and repugnance when the Europeans told, and then showed, them that they considered women and children fair game in their style of warfare.
                According to one scholar, “The most notable feature of Indian warfare was its relative innocuity.” European observers of Indian wars often expressed surprise at how little harm they actually inflicted. “Their wars are far less bloody and devouring than the cruel wars of Europe,” commented settler Roger Williams in 1643. Even Puritan warmonger and professional soldier Capt. John Mason scoffed at Indian warfare: “[Their] feeble manner…did hardly deserve the name of fighting.” Fellow warmonger John Underhill spoke of the Narragansetts, after having spent a day “burning and spoiling” their country: “no Indians would come near us, but run from us, as the deer from the dogs.” He concluded that the Indians might fight seven years and not kill seven men. Their fighting style, he wrote, “is more for pastime, than to conquer and subdue enemies.”
                All this describes a people for whom war is a deeply regrettable last resort. An agrarian people, the American Indians had devised a civilization that provided dozens of options all designed to avoid conflict–the very opposite of Europeans, for whom all-out war, a ferocious bloodlust, and systematic genocide are their apparent life force. Thomas Jefferson–who himself advocated the physical extermination of the American Indian–said of Europe, “They [Europeans] are nations of eternal war. All their energies are expended in the destruction of labor, property and lives of their people.”
                Puritan Holocaust
                By the mid 1630s, a new group of 700 even holier Europeans calling themselves Puritans had arrived on 11 ships and settled in Boston-which only served to accelerate the brutality against the Indians.
                In one incident around 1637, a force of whites trapped some seven hundred Pequot Indians, mostly women, children, and the elderly, near the mouth of the Mystic River. Englishman John Mason attacked the Indian camp with “fire, sword, blunderbuss, and tomahawk.” Only a handful escaped and few prisoners were taken-to the apparent delight of the Europeans:
                To see them frying in the fire, and the streams of their blood quenching the same, and the stench was horrible; but the victory seemed a sweet sacrifice, and they gave praise thereof to God.
                This event marked the first actual Thanksgiving. In just 10 years 12,000 whites had invaded New England, and as their numbers grew they pressed for all-out extermination of the Indian. Euro-diseases had reduced the population of the Massachusett nation from over 24,000 to less than 750; meanwhile, the number of European settlers in Massachusetts rose to more than 20,000 by 1646.
                By 1675, the Massachusetts Englishmen were in a full-scale war with the great Indian chief of the Wampanoags, Metacomet. Renamed “King Philip” by the white man, Metacomet watched the steady erosion of the lifestyle and culture of his people as European-imposed laws and values engulfed them.
                In 1671, the white man had ordered Metacomet to come to Plymouth to enforce upon him a new treaty, which included the humiliating rule that he could no longer sell his own land without prior approval from whites. They also demanded that he turn in his community’s firearms. Marked for extermination by the merciless power of a distant king and his ruthless subjects, Metacomet retaliated in 1675 with raids on several isolated frontier towns. Eventually, the Indians attacked 52 of the 90 New England towns, destroying 13 of them. The Englishmen ultimately regrouped, and after much bloodletting defeated the great Indian nation, just half a century after their arrival on Massachusetts soil. Historian Douglas Edward Leach describes the bitter end:
                The ruthless executions, the cruel sentences…were all aimed at the same goal-unchallengeable white supremacy in southern New England. That the program succeeded is convincingly demonstrated by the almost complete docility of the local native ever since.
                When Captain Benjamin Church tracked down and murdered Metacomet in 1676, his body was quartered and parts were “left for the wolves.” The great Indian chief’s hands were cut off and sent to Boston and his head went to Plymouth, where it was set upon a pole on the real first “day of public Thanksgiving for the beginning of revenge upon the enemy.” Metacomet’s nine-year-old son was destined for execution because, the whites reasoned, the offspring of the devil must pay for the sins of their father. The child was instead shipped to the Caribbean to spend his life in slavery.
                As the Holocaust continued, several official Thanksgiving Days were proclaimed. Governor Joseph Dudley declared in 1704 a “General Thanksgiving”-not in celebration of the brotherhood of man-but for [God’s] infinite Goodness to extend His Favors…In defeating and disappointing… the Expeditions of the Enemy [Indians] against us, And the good Success given us against them, by delivering so many of them into our hands…
                Just two years later one could reap a ££50 reward in Massachusetts for the scalp of an Indian-demonstrating that the practice of scalping was a European tradition. According to one scholar, “Hunting redskins became…a popular sport in New England, especially since prisoners were worth good money…”
                References in The Hidden History of Massachusetts: A Guide for Black Folks ©© DR. TINGBA APIDTA, ; ISBN 0-9714462-0-2

                • Ken says:

                  LA DE DA! and THIS has WHAT to do with our current problems? And the future of America? Kens America? Sorry honey! I was born in the 20th century!

            • Ken says:

              want to try getting rid of me LAID LAILA? Instead of wishing someone ELSE would do it, I challenge YOU TO COME TRY!!!!!!! Ive ALOT of BACK 40’s here! Take your pick where you wish to LAY! LAYLA!

              • Ken says:

                Only a MUSLIM would know all that BS about MUSLIM SHIT! OR care to LEARN IN DETAIL as YOU have! Still think she ISNT Muslim RED NECKED WARRIOR? I DOUBT IM WRONG!!!!!! YOU owe me an apology!

                • Ken…

                  I don’t owe you anything! I know about what the Koran says and anyone who can use a computer can find that information if they can’t get hold of a Koran to read!

                  A muslim would not be putting into print the truth about Islam or calling Mohammhead their prophet a pedophile. YOU ARE WRONG! I’m sure of it!!

                  If you don’t know who your enemy is then you don’t know anything!!

                  BTW…The name is Redneck Dixie Warrior….. Use it properly Please!

                  I’m walking away from your BS Ken…..not because you have won…but due to my being tired of your ignorance and low class. Your toxicity is simply astounding!

                  • Laila Rasheed says:

                    YO WARRIOR,

                    Have you ever heard a Mohammedan sing my hero’s song:

                    Waylon Jennings –

                    I’ve Always Been Crazy Lyrics

                    I’ve always been crazy and the trouble that it’s put me through
                    I’ve been busted for things that I did, and I didn’t do
                    I can’t say I’m proud of all of the things that I’ve done
                    But I can say I’ve never intentionally hurt anyone

                    I’ve always been different with one foot over the line
                    Winding up somewhere one step ahead or behind
                    It ain’t been so easy but I guess I shouldn’t complain
                    I’ve always been crazy but it’s kept me from going insane

                    Beautiful lady are you sure that you understand
                    The chances your taking loving a free living man
                    Are you really sure you really want what you see
                    Be careful of something that’s just what you want it to be

                    I’ve always been crazy but it’s kept me from going insane
                    Nobody knows if it’s something to bless or to blame
                    So far I ain’t found a rhyme or a reason to change
                    I’ve always been crazy but it’s kept me from going insane

                    Its IMBECILES like Ken, that has America the way it is!

                    If its non on CNN, CBS etc, then it hasn’t happened!

                    Ken is a COMPULSIVE wanker & has a lot in common with Mohammedans – brain-dead!

                    • Ken says:

                      by the way I dont LISTEN to CNN or CBS! Talk about brain dead! Beautiful lady? Where does that come from? LOL Your hallucinating again! GO smoke some more pot, sniff some coke, and try a bit more other stuff your on! YOUR NOT gojng to beat me! Say what you want! GOD KNOWS! And your already insane! Compulsive wanker? LOL OMG you dont know me! and SO wrong! But how do you know MOHAMMEDANS do that? Muslim LAIDLA Try reading the BIBLE! Instead of Koran!

                  • Ken says:

                    why should I WANT to learn what the fucking KORAN says! Im NOT a Muslim! I see what they do without learning their shit! I dont give a shit what YOU pixie redneck, OR LAILA LAID say! Im interested in what the future of AMERICA and whats been happening to it. NOT in your BS. You ADMIT you know what the KORAN says! Tell me MISS DICKsy stix warrior! Is it something ALL Americans should learn? Just because you can GOOGLE it on the internet, Americans should learn it? YOU sound like a bitch Muslim too! Tell me! HOW many AMERICANS do you think are concerned about what the KORAN says? Take a POLL! NOT VERY MANY I can tell you that! There should be MORE people interested in what the BIBLE says! NOT THE KORAN! Maybe IF more people knew and DID what GOD says we wouldnt be were we are today as a NATION and a SOCIETY! Do YOU know the Bible? You claim to know KORAN! Does LAIDLA know the Bible? Can she quote from IT like she does MUSLIM BS? Did YOU know you can google the HOLY BIBLE???? TRY IT SOMETIME!!!!!! Maybe itll help you understand why I DONT need to learn KORAN! OH while your at it? Read the American Constitution! READ THE BIBLE! ITLL TELL YOU WHO THE ENEMY IS! NOT THE KORAN!
                    Talk about ignorance and NO CLASS! Im waving goodbye! As you “WALK AWAY” Your words. not mine. Cant argue with Muslims OR democrats! Your priorities are FAR LEFT honey!

                    • Laila Rasheed says:

                      A READING FROM THE HOLY BIBLE:

                      The harlot by the roadside
                      Genesis 38
                      Judah was the fourth son – and chosen heir – of Jacob and Leah. But he had married a Canaanite, so his three sons were not pure Hebrew; and he had no grandchildren. After his first son had died childless, his widow, Tamar, married Judah’s second son, Onan, who also died. Custom dictated that she should then marry the third son, but Judah wanted her out of the family. Tamar, undeterred, disguised herself as a prostitute and waited to seduce Judah as he came in from the fields. Months later, Judah heard that his unwanted daughter-in-law was pregnant and sent for her to be judged and condemned. He discovered, to his surprise, that he had sired an heir in his old age. “She hath been more righteous than I,” was his verdict.
                      Genesis 38
                      Another take on the tale of Judah and Tamar. Onan’s older brother had sinned, so God killed him. Onan’s dad said: “Go in to thy brother’s wife and marry her, that thou mayest raise seed to thy brother.” In other words, their children would, legally, count as the dead brother’s children. Onan disagreed so he “spilled his seed upon the ground … and the Lord slew him, because he did a detestable thing.” This has been told to children as a fable of the evils of masturbation, though the text implies all Onan did was commit coitus interruptus.
                      The Rape of Tamar
                      2 Samuel 3
                      King David was a fine king, but his family was dysfunctional. His son, Amnon, conspired with a cousin to seduce Tamar, David’s daughter and Amnon’s half-sister. When she would not consent to sex, he raped her, and then “hated her with a very great hatred”. It seemed at first that he had got away with it, but two years later Absalom, Tamar’s brother, invited Amnon to a celebration, got him drunk, and had him killed. In short, a thoroughly depressing tale of Old Testament sex and violence.
                      Ruth and Boaz
                      This at least is an uplifting love story, though it nearly went wrong. The widow, Ruth, loves Boaz, her husband’s relative, but there is a closer relative who is obliged by custom to marry Ruth and perpetuate the dead husband’s line. Luckily, he did not want the hassle, so Ruth and Boaz lived happily ever after.
                      Samson and Delilah
                      Judges 16
                      Samson should never have trusted that woman. He should have deduced that she was a spy for the Philistines when she kept pestering him for the secret of his great strength. Three times, he had the sense to tease her by telling a false story; then, in thrall to her charms, he let on that if he had a hair cut, his strength would go. That was his undoing. What happened to the treacherous Delilah, the Bible does not say. But the affair stands as an archetypal case of sexual betrayal.
                      Lot and his daughters
                      Genesis 19
                      The Lot family were having a grand time in the sinful city of Sodom until God rained fire and brimstone upon it, and Lot’s wife was turned to a pillar of salt for turning round to watch. Father and daughters wound up in a cave. The two girls started to panic that they would never have children, so conspired to get their virtuous father drunk. The result was that Lot had two sons, Moab and Ben-Ammi.
                      King Solomon’s concubines
                      Kings 11
                      Solomon may have been wise, but he was sexually insatiable. He “loved many foreign women, as well as the daughters of Pharaoh; women of the Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Sidonians and Hittites … and he had 700 wives, princesses, and 300 concubines” – and the Queen of Sheba. Some of these seemed to encourage him to worship other gods; the Lord sent enemies against Israel as a punishment.
                      David and Bathsheba
                      Samuel 2
                      While David’s men were finishing off the Ammonites, the King stayed in Jerusalem and got bored. Wandering about on the roof, he saw a beautiful woman bathing, and ordered that she be sent to his bedroom. She was Bathsheba, wife of Uriah the Hittite. When she became pregnant, David tried to cover up his sin by recalling Uriah from the front, but Uriah, a conscientious soldier, would not sleep with his wife while his comrades were at risk. David made secret arrangements for Uriah to be killed in battle, and married Bathsheba. Later, he felt terrible, and repented.
                      The rape of Dinah
                      Genesis 34
                      While the Jews were in Canaan, Dinah, daughter of Leah and Jacob, paid a call on a neighbouring tribe, the Hivites. While doing so, she was raped by a young nobleman called Shechem – although the word “rape” is not used in standard English translations, and there is some scholarly dispute about it. Afterwards, Shechem wanted to marry Dinah, and he and his father, Hamor, visited Jacob’s tent to open negotiations. Jacob’s s sons intervened to insist that their sister could not marry into a tribe where the men were uncircumcised. Amazingly, Shechem went back to his tribe and persuaded all the men to go through this operation. But no marriage ensued. While they were weakened by pain, Dinah’s brothers, Simeon and Levi, massacred them all and took her home.
                      The Levite’s concubine
                      Judges 19
                      Why a Levite, his concubine and his servant were travelling from Bethlehem back to their homes in the hills of Ephraim is a complex tale in itself. What concerns us here is that, on their way, they stayed over in Gibeah, where they lodged for the night with an old Ephraimite they had met along the way. During the night a mob, with homosexual rape in mind, surrounded the house and demanded that the Levite be sent out.
                      The host offered them his virgin daughter and the concubine instead; eventually the poor concubine was thrown to the mob. At dawn the Levite found her either dead or comatose on the doorstep. He took her inside and cut her up into 12 pieces. A peculiarly brutal tale.

                    • Kenny cupcake…

                      Time to get back on your meds or have the doctor help you with your cranial rectumitis problem! The Methane is killing off brain cells and well, it seems…you only have one left!

                      Two last rudes for you! YEB VOZZ

                      Google it in Interpreter!!

          • Laila Rasheed says:



            First, we need to establish that Islam allows female children to be married and engaged in sex prior to their first menses (prepubescent). For that we turn to the Islamic source materials. Starting with the Quran:
            If you are in doubt concerning those of your wives who have ceased menstruating, know that their waiting period shall be three months. The same shall apply to those who have not menstruated. As for pregnant women, their term shall end with their confinement. God will ease the hardship of the man who fears him. Qur’an, sura 65:4, Dawood
            The surrounding context deals with the issue of the waiting period for divorce, and remarriage. The Quran is telling Muslims to wait for a certain period of time before making the divorce final or deciding to forego it. The Quran exhorts men to wait a period of three months in the case of women who either are no longer menstruating or haven’t even started their menstrual cycles! (Source)
            Since Muslim men are to wait 3 months before divorcing a prepubescent child it means that they have been engaging in sex with those children.
            I quote three Islamic scholars commentary related to Qur’an, sura 65:4 and the subject of sex with prepubescent children:
            Ibn Kathir writes regarding 65:4
            , “The `Iddah is made up of cleanliness and the menstrual period.” So he divorces her while it is clear that she is pregnant, or he does not due to having sex, or since he does not know if she is pregnant or not. This is why the scholars said that there are two types of divorce, one that conforms to the Sunnah and another innovated. The divorce that conforms to the Sunnah is one where the husband pronounces one divorce to his wife when she is not having her menses and without having had sexual intercourse with her after the menses ended. One could divorce his wife when it is clear that she is pregnant. As for the innovated divorce, it occurs when one divorces his wife when she is having her menses, or after the menses ends, has sexual intercourse with her and then divorces her, even though he does not know if she became pregnant or not. There is a third type of divorce, which is neither a Sunnah nor an innovation where one divorces A YOUNG WIFE WHO HAS NOT BEGUN TO HAVE MENSES, the wife who is beyond the age of having menses, and divorcing one’s wife before the marriage was consummated. (Source; bold and capital emphasis ours)
            Al-Tabari said regarding 65:4
            The interpretation of the verse “And those of your women as have passed the age of monthly courses, for them the ‘Iddah (prescribed period), if you have doubt (about their periods), is three months; and for those who have no courses [(i.e. they are still immature) their ‘Iddah (prescribed period) is three months likewise”. He said: The same applies to the ‘idaah for girls who do not menstruate because they are too young, if their husbands divorce them after consummating the marriage with them.
            Tafseer al-Tabari, 14/142 (Source: Islam Q&A (www.islam-qa.com)
            (Question #12708: Is it acceptable to marry a girl who has not yet started her menses?)
            Regarding sex with prepubescent children, Abu-Ala’ Maududi states:
            “Therefore, making mention of the waiting-period for girls who have not yet menstruated, clearly proves that it is not only permissible to give away the girl at this age but it is permissible for the husband to consummate marriage with her. Now, obviously no Muslim has the right to forbid a thing which the Qur’an has held as permissible.” (Maududi, volume 5, p. 620, note 13,)

    • upaces88 says:

      Calm down….Google: Hillary and her college years. Women saw her coming in the ladies room, and the place emptied out.
      That is VERY hard …. but common knowledge.

      • He’s not bright enough to use google! He is a troll and is just wanting to cause chaos and a fight! I’m done with his toxicity….

        • Ken says:

          You have no idea what your talking about! YOUR the ones who started the fight! Thinking your so damn smart. Toxicity? your the toxic one. Troll? Your a witch! The day will come you will see how wrong you all were! AND IGNORANT!


    Professor Andrea Zabel


    “People think monsters commit these crimes, so they must look like monsters,” Clingman said. “They don’t. They look like the guy next door.

    “A lot of these mothers shack up with anybody and don’t give any thought to what they’re exposing their child to. Murders by strangers are very unusual. Most crimes against kids are by people who have easy access to them.”

    Belazi said the cases “are very stressful and you feel the weight of them on your shoulders. My feeling is that people who harm children should never be given an opportunity to do that again. It’s an inexcusable crime.” Midland College Psychology Professor Andrea Zabel said the phenomenon may have animalistic origins.

    “There are more step-dads and boyfriends who kill children,” she said.

    “When biological fathers do it, they usually take everybody out. Some people look at it from an evolutionary perspective. When a female bear has a cub and is nursing it, she won’t copulate. If a male bear kills the cub, she will go into heat again and copulate with him.”

    Dr. Zabel said women and children are victimized because they’re vulnerable. Sometimes it’s a matter of rage and previous abuse and that person can’t take it out on someone their own size,” she said.

    Dear Andrea,

    Can you please help me understand this terrible holocaust?



    What is the total number of legal abortions since 1973?
    Since the legalization of abortion in 1973, there have been approximately 50 million abortions performed in the United States.
    Source: Guttmacher Institute, 2011, August. Facts on Induced Abortion in the United States.
    How many abortions are performed in the United States each year?
    According to the Guttmacher Institute, there were 1.21 million abortions performed in the United States in 2008, the most recent year for which data is available. This amounts to 3,322 abortions per day.
    Source: Jones, Rachel K. and Kathryn Kooistra. “Abortion Incidence and Access to Services in the United States, 2008.” Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 43, no. 1 (2011, March): 41-50

    What are the methods of abortion and at what stages of pregnancy are they used?
    The following abortion methods are used regularly in the United States. Saline abortions are no longer performed.
    • Suction Aspiration—6-12 weeks
    • D & C (Dilation and Curettage)—6-12 weeks
    • D & E (Dilation and Evacuation)—12-24 weeks
    • D & X (Dilation and Extraction or Partial Birth Abortion)—24-36 weeks
    • Prostaglandin or Live Birth Abortion—second or third trimester
    • RU-486 (Early chemical abortion)—up to 56 days gestation
    How is a Suction Aspiration abortion performed?
    Suction aspiration, the most common abortion method, is typically performed when the fetus is 6-12 weeks, but can be used up to 16 weeks. The cervix is dilated, and a hollow plastic tube with a sharp tip is inserted into the cervix and then into the uterus. An aspirator attached to the tube tears the body of the fetus apart and suctions the pieces through the tube.
    How is a D & C abortion performed?
    A suction/D & C abortion is performed when the fetus is 6-12 weeks. The cervix is opened using an osmotic dilator. Then a curette (a thin metal rod with a knife-sharp loop at the end) is inserted into the uterus. The curette is used to dismember the fetus.
    After this, a cannula (a hollow plastic tube) attached to a suction aspirator is inserted to remove the fetus, placenta and uterine lining. These are captured by a stockinet attached to the end of the suction tube.
    To avoid the risk of infection or hemorrhaging, the contents of the stockinet are examined to be sure all fetal parts have been removed.
    How is dilation and evacuation abortion (D & E) performed?
    A D & E abortion is performed in the second trimester (12-24 weeks) and is usually a 2-3 day procedure. At this stage of pregnancy, the fetus’ tendons, muscles, and bones are more developed. The cervix has closed more tightly and must be dilated enough to remove the larger fetus.
    To aid in cervical dilation, laminaria (dried seaweed sticks) are inserted into the cervix. The dilation process can take 1-2 days depending on the size of the fetus.
    Once the cervix is sufficiently dilated, the laminaria are removed. Forceps are inserted into the uterus to forcibly dismember the fetus. The skull is then crushed and removed. A suction aspiration is then introduced to remove any remaining fetal parts, the placenta and uterine lining.
    How is a partial birth abortion (D & X) performed?
    The D & X abortion is used in late second and third trimesters (24-36 weeks). As with the D & E, the cervix must be dilated using laminaria.
    Forceps are then introduced into the uterus to grasp the baby’s legs. The baby is delivered breech while the head remains inside the birth canal. Using blunt-tipped surgical scissors, the base of the skull is pierced and a suction catheter is inserted to extract the brain. This causes the skull to collapse and the dead baby is then fully delivered.
    Sometimes, while the child is partially delivered and still alive, the organs are removed and sold for fetal tissue experimentation (an illegal practice).
    How is a live birth abortion (prostaglandin) performed?
    A Prostaglandin or Live Birth Abortion is done in the second or third trimester. Prostaglandins are naturally occurring chemical compounds which assist in the birthing process. For the abortion procedure, artificial prostaglandins are injected into the amniotic sac which induces violent labor and leads to the birth of a child usually too young to survive.
    Often salt or another toxin is first injected to ensure that the baby will be delivered dead, since some babies have survived the trauma of a prostaglandin abortion and been born alive.
    How is a chemical abortion (RU-486) performed?
    RU-486 is a chemical (rather than a surgical) abortion, performed up to 49 days gestation. RU-486 requires at least three visits to the doctor’s office or clinic.
    At the first visit, the woman is given a physical exam and is administered mifepristone. RU-486 blocks the action of progesterone, the natural hormone vital to maintaining the lining of the uterus. The embryo starves as the nutrient lining disintegrates.
    At a second visit, 36-48 hours later, the woman is giving a dose of artificial prostaglandins, usually misoprostol, which initiate uterine contractions and usually cause the embryo to be expelled from the uterus. Most women abort during the four hour waiting period, but about 30% abort as many as five days later—at home, work, etc.
    A third visit about 2 weeks later determines whether the abortion has occurred or if a surgical abortion is necessary to complete the procedure.
    Dr. Martin Haskell giving a presentation at the 16th Annual Meeting of the National Abortion Federation Conference in 1992 in San Diego. It was a gathering of abortionists — men and women who make their living by killing babies. Haskell was describing to his audience how to do a partial-birth abortion. Listen to his words about how this procedure takes place:
    “The surgeon then introduces large grasping forceps … through the vaginal and cervical canal … He moves the tip of the instrument carefully towards the fetal lower extremities — and pulls the extremity into the vagina …The surgeon then uses his fingers to deliver the opposite lower extremity, then the torso, the shoulders, and the upper extremities. The skull lodges in the internal os. The fetus is oriented … spine up …
    The surgeon then takes a pair of blunt curved Metzenbaum scissors in the right hand. … the surgeon then forces the scissors into the base of the skull–spreads the scissors to enlarge the opening. The surgeon–surgeon then introduces a suction catheter into this hole and evacuates the skull contents.”
    Haskell, having described these brutal details, shows his audience a video of himself doing one of these procedures. And at the end of the video, after the sound of the suction machine taking the brains out of the baby’s head, the audience applauds.
    Fetal tissue wholesalers are companies which place employees in abortion clinics to harvest tissue, limbs, organs, etc. from aborted babies. This material is then shipped to researchers working for universities, pharmaceutical companies and government agencies. Although it is against federal law to sell human tissue or body parts, these organizations have devised a system to circumvent this restriction. Technically, all fetal material they harvest is “donated” to them by the clinics. However, they do pay a “site fee” to the clinics for the right to access the tissue. The tissue is then “donated” to the researchers who in turn pay the wholesalers for the cost of retrieval. Profit is realized by the wholesalers’ ability to set their own retrieval fees.

  4. upaces88 says:

    OMG! Let’s just be civilized about this! File divorce and take everything he has LOL.

    • What if he has nothing?….Sometimes just the scare tactic works wonders! LOL! This would be my solution though for those guys who rape women and children……

    • Ken says:

      i wish id never have made a comment here upaces! I never expected this crap to happen! It was a fun post when I first posted! But I know there are plenty OTHERS from republicans and democrats and socialists and muslims who read them. Clinton ass kissers. Obama worshippers. ALLAH freaks. They will NEVER break me!!!!!!!!

      • boudicabpi says:

        Ken, you’re always welcome to express your views here. I wish there had not been so much snapping back and forth but I’m not a moderator and do/will not censor comments.

        • Ken says:

          i dont expect you to! Thank you! And I CAN hold my own! Praying for them! And for INNOCENT Americans!

      • Laila Rasheed says:

        YO KEN,

        “They will NEVER break me!!!!!!!!”

        Now you can sing it:

        Never Gonna Break Me Down

        There used to be hope but now I´ve lost it,
        It`s gone for ever Being a better person
        Used to be something but now I´ve lost it
        There used to be better times
        Better places where I was happier
        Being a better person used to be something
        I used to be proud of
        You always hurt the ones you love the most
        The ones you´re not supposed to hurt at all

        You`ll never
        No you`re never
        Gonna break me down
        If you try
        You´ll never No you`re never
        Gonna break me down

        There used to be hope but now I`ve lost it,
        It`s gone for ever
        Being a better person used to be something
        I used to be proud of

        You always hurt the ones you love the most
        The ones you´re not supposed to hurt at all
        You`ll never,
        No you´re never…
        I don`t want to be left in the backyards
        But your love is so strong that I can`t help myself,
        Stop now

        You`ll never(you`ll never)
        No you`re never(you never)
        Gonna break me down
        (will break me down)
        If you try
        You`ll never…

        • Ken says:

          better places? Then maybe you should go back to the muslim country you came from! If it was so much better there.

        • Ken says:

          Praying for you Laila! And you Dixieredneck! Im wondering if your not one and the same person! Just different names/emails/profiles.God have mercy on you and LEAD you to truth!

        • Ken says:

          id NEVER want to break anyone down! Yould never find a kinder more caring person anywhere. than ME!

          • Laila Rasheed says:

            YO KEN,

            “id NEVER want to break anyone down! Yould never find a kinder more caring person anywhere. than ME!”

            Is that a direct quote from MEIN KAMPF?

  5. Ken says:

    thats what Hillary should have done with BILL! LOL

    • Laila Rasheed says:

      YO KEN,

      Hillary LOVES pussy- Muslim Brotherhood-type pussy!


      Bill was like Oliver in Charles Dickens book, “Please Monica, I want some more”!

      “Hillary doesn’t feed me”!


      “I have a dream……………………………………” MLK

      “Ask not………………………………………………” JFK

      “Suck it, ………………………………………………”WJC

      “Pull it,………………………………………………….”LAS

      “Fcuk it………………………………………………….”LBJ

      “All deliveries in the backway…………………….”BHO

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s